lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v3 2/3] hwrng: starfive - Add TRNG driver for StarFive SoC
Date


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> Sent: 10 January, 2023 3:41 PM
> To: JiaJie Ho <jiajie.ho@starfivetech.com>
> Cc: Olivia Mackall <olivia@selenic.com>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>;
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>; Emil Renner
> Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>; Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>;
> linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] hwrng: starfive - Add TRNG driver for StarFive
> SoC
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:52:48AM +0800, Jia Jie Ho wrote:
> >
> > +static irqreturn_t starfive_trng_irq(int irq, void *priv) {
> > + u32 status;
> > + struct starfive_trng *trng = (struct starfive_trng *)priv;
> > +
> > + status = readl(trng->base + STARFIVE_ISTAT);
> > + if (status & STARFIVE_ISTAT_RAND_RDY) {
> > + writel(STARFIVE_ISTAT_RAND_RDY, trng->base +
> STARFIVE_ISTAT);
> > + complete(&trng->random_done);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (status & STARFIVE_ISTAT_SEED_DONE) {
> > + writel(STARFIVE_ISTAT_SEED_DONE, trng->base +
> STARFIVE_ISTAT);
> > + complete(&trng->reseed_done);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (status & STARFIVE_ISTAT_LFSR_LOCKUP) {
> > + writel(STARFIVE_ISTAT_LFSR_LOCKUP, trng->base +
> STARFIVE_ISTAT);
> > + /* SEU occurred, reseeding required*/
> > + writel(STARFIVE_CTRL_EXEC_RANDRESEED, trng->base +
> STARFIVE_CTRL);
>
> This could occur at the same time as a GENE_RANDNUM write so perhaps
> you should add some locking?
>

I'll add those in the next version.

> > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, starfive_trng_irq, 0, pdev-
> >name,
> > + (void *)trng);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > + "Failed to register interrupt handler\n");
>
> ...
>
> > + init_completion(&trng->random_done);
> > + init_completion(&trng->reseed_done);
>
> These completion initialisations should be moved above the IRQ registration
> because you should always be prepared to get spurious interrupts.
>

Will update these too.

> Otherwise the patch looks good.
>

Thanks again for reviewing the patch and providing the useful feedbacks.

Best regards,
Jia Jie

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:34    [W:0.032 / U:1.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site