Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 8 Sep 2022 17:52:29 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] thermal: mediatek: add another get_temp ops for thermal sensors | From | Amjad Ouled-Ameur <> |
| |
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for the review.
On 9/8/22 11:07, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > Hi Amjad, > > On 01/09/2022 15:39, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote: >> Provide thermal zone to read thermal sensor in the SoC. We can read >> all the >> thermal sensors value in the SoC by the node /sys/class/thermal/ >> >> In mtk_thermal_bank_temperature, return -EAGAIN instead of -EACCESS >> on the first read of sensor that often are bogus values. >> This can avoid following warning on boot: >> >> thermal thermal_zone6: failed to read out thermal zone (-13) >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Kao <michael.kao@mediatek.com> >> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org> >> Signed-off-by: Amjad Ouled-Ameur <aouledameur@baylibre.com> >> --- >> Changes in V3: >> - Use proper types. >> - Use devm_kmalloc() instead of kmalloc(). >> - Fix tabs and spaces. >> >> drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- >> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c >> b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c >> index 088c388da241..5901787c57f5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c >> @@ -259,6 +259,11 @@ enum mtk_thermal_version { >> struct mtk_thermal; >> +struct mtk_thermal_zone { >> + struct mtk_thermal *mt; >> + int id; >> +}; >> + >> struct thermal_bank_cfg { >> unsigned int num_sensors; >> const int *sensors; >> @@ -709,6 +714,32 @@ static void mtk_thermal_put_bank(struct >> mtk_thermal_bank *bank) >> mutex_unlock(&mt->lock); >> } >> +static int _get_sensor_temp(struct mtk_thermal *mt, int id) >> +{ >> + u32 raw; >> + int temp; >> + >> + const struct mtk_thermal_data *conf = mt->conf; >> + >> + raw = readl(mt->thermal_base + conf->msr[id]); >> + >> + if (mt->conf->version == MTK_THERMAL_V1) >> + temp = raw_to_mcelsius_v1(mt, id, raw); >> + else >> + temp = raw_to_mcelsius_v2(mt, id, raw); > > Can you set a callback at init time instead of checking the version at > each get_sensor_temp() ? > Good idea, will add it in v4. >> + /* >> + * The first read of a sensor often contains very high bogus >> + * temperature value. Filter these out so that the system does >> + * not immediately shut down. >> + */ >> + >> + if (temp > 200000) >> + return -EAGAIN; >> + else >> + return temp; >> +} >> + >> /** >> * mtk_thermal_bank_temperature - get the temperature of a bank >> * @bank: The bank >> @@ -721,26 +752,9 @@ static int mtk_thermal_bank_temperature(struct >> mtk_thermal_bank *bank) >> struct mtk_thermal *mt = bank->mt; >> const struct mtk_thermal_data *conf = mt->conf; >> int i, temp = INT_MIN, max = INT_MIN; >> - u32 raw; >> for (i = 0; i < conf->bank_data[bank->id].num_sensors; i++) { >> - raw = readl(mt->thermal_base + conf->msr[i]); >> - >> - if (mt->conf->version == MTK_THERMAL_V1) { >> - temp = raw_to_mcelsius_v1( >> - mt, conf->bank_data[bank->id].sensors[i], raw); >> - } else { >> - temp = raw_to_mcelsius_v2( >> - mt, conf->bank_data[bank->id].sensors[i], raw); >> - } >> - >> - /* >> - * The first read of a sensor often contains very high bogus >> - * temperature value. Filter these out so that the system does >> - * not immediately shut down. >> - */ >> - if (temp > 200000) >> - temp = 0; >> + temp = _get_sensor_temp(mt, i); >> if (temp > max) >> max = temp; >> @@ -751,7 +765,8 @@ static int mtk_thermal_bank_temperature(struct >> mtk_thermal_bank *bank) >> static int mtk_read_temp(void *data, int *temperature) >> { >> - struct mtk_thermal *mt = data; >> + struct mtk_thermal_zone *tz = data; >> + struct mtk_thermal *mt = tz->mt; >> int i; >> int tempmax = INT_MIN; >> @@ -770,10 +785,28 @@ static int mtk_read_temp(void *data, int >> *temperature) >> return 0; >> } >> +static int mtk_read_sensor_temp(void *data, int *temperature) >> +{ >> + struct mtk_thermal_zone *tz = data; >> + struct mtk_thermal *mt = tz->mt; >> + int id = tz->id - 1; >> + >> + if (id < 0) >> + return -EACCES; >> + >> + *temperature = _get_sensor_temp(mt, id); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops mtk_thermal_ops = { >> .get_temp = mtk_read_temp, >> }; >> >> +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops >> mtk_thermal_sensor_ops = { >> + .get_temp = mtk_read_sensor_temp, >> +}; > > Please respin against linux-next, the thermal_zone_of_device_ops > structure does no longer exist. The conversion is trivial, here is a > example: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220804224349.1926752-21-daniel.lezcano@linexp.org/ > > Sure, will do. > >> static void mtk_thermal_init_bank(struct mtk_thermal *mt, int num, >> u32 apmixed_phys_base, u32 auxadc_phys_base, >> int ctrl_id) >> @@ -1072,6 +1105,7 @@ static int mtk_thermal_probe(struct >> platform_device *pdev) >> u64 auxadc_phys_base, apmixed_phys_base; >> struct thermal_zone_device *tzdev; >> void __iomem *apmixed_base, *auxadc_base; >> + struct mtk_thermal_zone *tz; >> mt = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mt), GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!mt) >> @@ -1161,11 +1195,29 @@ static int mtk_thermal_probe(struct >> platform_device *pdev) >> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mt); >> - tzdev = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev, 0, mt, >> - &mtk_thermal_ops); >> - if (IS_ERR(tzdev)) { >> - ret = PTR_ERR(tzdev); >> - goto err_disable_clk_peri_therm; >> + for (i = 0; i < mt->conf->num_sensors + 1; i++) { >> + tz = devm_kmalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*tz), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!tz) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + tz->mt = mt; >> + tz->id = i; >> + >> + tzdev = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev, i, >> tz, (i == 0) ? >> + &mtk_thermal_ops : >> + &mtk_thermal_sensor_ops); >> + >> + if (IS_ERR(tzdev)) { >> + if (PTR_ERR(tzdev) == -ENODEV) { >> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, >> + "sensor %d not registered in thermal zone in >> dt\n", i); >> + continue; >> + } >> + if (PTR_ERR(tzdev) == -EACCES) { >> + ret = PTR_ERR(tzdev); >> + goto err_disable_clk_peri_therm; >> + } >> + } >> } >> ret = devm_thermal_add_hwmon_sysfs(tzdev); > > Regards,
Amjad
| |