lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8953: add MDSS
Date
Hi Dmitry,

On Dienstag, 6. September 2022 21:41:11 CEST Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Sept 2022 at 21:36, Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz> wrote:
> > From: Vladimir Lypak <vladimir.lypak@gmail.com>
> >
> > Add the MDSS, MDP and DSI nodes that are found on msm8953 SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Lypak <vladimir.lypak@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
> > ---
> > Changes since v2:
> > - add "core" clock for mdss as suggested by Dmitry Baryshkov
> >
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953.dtsi | 210 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 210 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953.dtsi index 3d11331e78d2..580333141a66
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953.dtsi
> > @@ -726,6 +726,216 @@ tcsr_phy_clk_scheme_sel: syscon@193f044 {
> >
> > reg = <0x193f044 0x4>;
> >
> > };
> >
> > + mdss: mdss@1a00000 {
> > + compatible = "qcom,mdss";
> > +
> > + reg = <0x1a00000 0x1000>,
> > + <0x1ab0000 0x1040>;
> > + reg-names = "mdss_phys",
> > + "vbif_phys";
> > +
> > + power-domains = <&gcc MDSS_GDSC>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 72 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
> > + <&gcc GCC_MDSS_AXI_CLK>,
> > + <&gcc GCC_MDSS_VSYNC_CLK>,
> > + <&gcc GCC_MDSS_MDP_CLK>;
> > + clock-names = "iface",
> > + "bus",
> > + "vsync",
> > + "core";
> > +
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > + ranges;
> > +
> > + status = "disabled";
> > +
> > + mdp: mdp@1a01000 {
> > + compatible = "qcom,mdp5";
>
> Could you please change this to "qcom,msm8953-mdp5", "qcom,mdp5".

This would be the first dtsi using the two compatibles then, correct? Are there
any plans to adjust other SoCs?

>
> > + reg = <0x1a01000 0x89000>;
> > + reg-names = "mdp_phys";
> > +
>
> [skipped]
>
> > +
> > + dsi0_phy: dsi-phy@1a94400 {
>
> Let's probably use a generic name 'phy' here and for dsi1_phy.

Here also, the bindings examples all use dsi-phy@, are there any plans to
change that and adjust other dtsi files?

>
> The rest looks good to me.

Thanks!

Regards
Luca

>
> > + compatible = "qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-8953";
> > + reg = <0x1a94400 0x100>,
> > + <0x1a94500 0x300>,
> > + <0x1a94800 0x188>;
> > + reg-names = "dsi_phy",
> > + "dsi_phy_lane",
> > + "dsi_pll";
> > +
> > + #clock-cells = <1>;
> > + #phy-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
> > <&xo_board>; + clock-names = "iface",
> > "ref";
> > +
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-07 17:31    [W:0.090 / U:0.708 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site