Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 7 Sep 2022 06:06:58 +0200 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] x86/asm/bitops: __ffs,ffz: use __builtin_ctzl to evaluate constant expressions |
| |
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 06:32:05AM +0900, Vincent MAILHOL wrote: > Agree that this is only the surface. But, my patch series is about > constant folding, not about the text of *ffs(). Here, I just *move* > the existing text, I did not modify anything. > Can we agree that this is a separate topic?
Sure we can.
But then you can't start your commit message with:
"__ffs(x) is equivalent to (unsigned long)__builtin_ctzl(x) and ffz(x) is equivalent to (unsigned long)__builtin_ctzl(~x)."
which will bring unenlightened readers like me into the very same mess.
So at least mention that there's a difference between the kernel implementation using hw insns which are well defined on some machines and what the glibc API does. So that at least people are aware that there's something dangerous to be cautious about.
Ok?
Thx.
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
| |