lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] of/fdt: Don't calculate initrd_start from the DT if 'linux,initrd-end' is 0
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:35:00 +0000
Marek Bykowski <marek.bykowski@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 20:12:41 -0500
> Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Shouldn't we just check that start < end?
> >
> > Can we check this somewhere not DT specific (and also not arch
> > specific)? Then we don't have to worry if any other method of
> > setting initrd could have the same error.
>
> Yes, we can switch from checking on the end being 0 to that proposed:
> - if (!end)
> - return;
> + if (start >= end)
> + return;
>
> Then the check would even go further as would also catch cases where
> end < start.
>
> My taking is early_init_dt_scan_chosen() that sets initrd size
> incorrectly is DT specific but generic/arch agnostic. So that if
> the error got introduced by a bootloader/U-Boot through the DT
> chosen node, we should catch it in DT and react.
>
> ARM64, for example, before going down for mapping for the incorrect
> address (some extra large address resulting from the negative to
> positive value conversion), has a check after DT parsing if
> phys_initrd_size is other than 0 to proceed, and it is so that it
> passes or in other words it doesn't catch the error.
>
> Marek

Hello Rob and others,

Any updates on it?

Marek

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-06 12:09    [W:0.836 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site