Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 7 Sep 2022 04:05:29 +1000 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mm tree |
| |
Hi Rob,
On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 05:05:32 -0700 Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> wrote: > > It looks like, at least for now, I can replace `sc->gfp_mask & > __GFP_ATOMIC` with `!(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM)`.. I'm not > sure if there would be any cases where we could otherwise sleep but > __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is not set?
The commit message for 9178e3dcb121 seems to say that would be correct.
-- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |