Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Sep 2022 16:41:26 +0200 | From | Andrew Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1] riscv : support update_mmu_tlb() for riscv |
| |
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 08:19:21PM +0800, Jinyu Tang wrote: > Add macro definition to support updata_mmu_tlb() for riscv, > this function is from commit:7df676974359 ("mm/memory.c:Update > local TLB if PTE entry exists"). > > Signed-off-by: Jinyu Tang <tjytimi@163.com> > --- > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > index 7ec936910a96..84a791d54f95 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > @@ -418,6 +418,9 @@ static inline void update_mmu_cache(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > local_flush_tlb_page(address); > } > > +#define __HAVE_ARCH_UPDATE_MMU_TLB ^ just a single space here, please, as all the other 'define __HAVE's in this file
> +#define update_mmu_tlb update_mmu_cache > + > static inline void update_mmu_cache_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmdp) > { > -- > 2.30.2
This seems like the right thing to do, so
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
I'm curious if this patch is the result of debugging something? Or what led you to post it?
Thanks, drew
| |