lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 8/9] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix typo
From
On 10/1/22 04:07, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> index 3a160ab0415b..1887685b41d2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> @@ -970,7 +970,7 @@ static void test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_enabled(void)
>
> /*
> * vcpu, mismatching keys on fetch,
> - * fetch protection override does not apply because memory range acceeded
> + * fetch protection override does not apply because memory range exceeded
> */
> CHECK_N_DO(ERR_PROT_MOP, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, READ, mem2, 2048 + 1, GADDR_V(0), KEY(2));
> CHECK_N_DO(ERR_PROT_MOP, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, READ, mem2, PAGE_SIZE + 2048 + 1,

No patch description? Seriously?

What about this one?:

```
The word "acceded" isn't the right word to describe too much memory
situation. Substitute it with "exceeded".
```

Thanks.

--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-10-01 05:22    [W:0.142 / U:1.796 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site