Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:15:58 -0700 | From | Colin Foster <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 12/14] dt-bindings: net: dsa: ocelot: add ocelot-ext documentation |
| |
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 11:26:00PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 05:29:26PM -0700, Colin Foster wrote: > > --- > > + - phy-mode = "internal": on ports 0, 1, 2, 3 > > More PHY interface types are supported. Please document them all. > It doesn't matter what the driver supports. Drivers and device tree > blobs should be able to have different lifetimes. A driver which doesn't > support the SERDES ports should work with a device tree that defines > them, and a driver that supports the SERDES ports should work with a > device tree that doesn't.
This will change my patch a little bit then. I didn't undersand this requirement.
My current device tree has all 8 ethernet ports populated. ocelot_ext believes "all these port modes are accepted" by way of a fully-populated vsc7512_port_modes[] array.
As a result, when I'm testing, swp4 through swp7 all enumerate as devices, though they don't actually function. It isn't until serdes / phylink / pcs / pll5 come along that they become functional ports.
I doubt this is desired. Though if I'm using the a new macro OCELOT_PORT_MODE_NONE, felix.c stops after felix_validate_phy_mode.
I think the only thing I can do is to allow felix to ignore invalid phy modes on some ports (which might be desired) and continue on with the most it can do. That seems like a potential improvement to the felix driver...
The other option is to allow the ports to enumerate, but leave them non-functional. This is how my system currently acts, but as I said, I bet it would be confusing to any user.
Thoughts?
|  |