Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 30 Sep 2022 22:01:35 +0200 | From | Andrew Lunn <> | Subject | Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: fec: using page pool to manage RX buffers |
| |
> The testing above was on the imx8 platform. The following are the testing result > On the imx6sx board: > > ######### Original implementation ###### > > shenwei@5810:~/pktgen$ iperf -c 10.81.16.245 -w 2m -i 1 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Client connecting to 10.81.16.245, TCP port 5001 > TCP window size: 416 KByte (WARNING: requested 1.91 MByte) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > [ 1] local 10.81.17.20 port 36486 connected with 10.81.16.245 port 5001 > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth > [ 1] 0.0000-1.0000 sec 70.5 MBytes 591 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 1.0000-2.0000 sec 64.5 MBytes 541 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 2.0000-3.0000 sec 73.6 MBytes 618 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 3.0000-4.0000 sec 73.6 MBytes 618 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 4.0000-5.0000 sec 72.9 MBytes 611 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 5.0000-6.0000 sec 73.4 MBytes 616 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 6.0000-7.0000 sec 73.5 MBytes 617 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 7.0000-8.0000 sec 73.4 MBytes 616 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 8.0000-9.0000 sec 73.4 MBytes 616 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 9.0000-10.0000 sec 73.9 MBytes 620 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 0.0000-10.0174 sec 723 MBytes 605 Mbits/sec > > > ###### Page Pool implémentation ######## > > shenwei@5810:~/pktgen$ iperf -c 10.81.16.245 -w 2m -i 1 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Client connecting to 10.81.16.245, TCP port 5001 > TCP window size: 416 KByte (WARNING: requested 1.91 MByte) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > [ 1] local 10.81.17.20 port 57288 connected with 10.81.16.245 port 5001 > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth > [ 1] 0.0000-1.0000 sec 78.8 MBytes 661 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 1.0000-2.0000 sec 82.5 MBytes 692 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 2.0000-3.0000 sec 82.4 MBytes 691 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 3.0000-4.0000 sec 82.4 MBytes 691 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 4.0000-5.0000 sec 82.5 MBytes 692 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 5.0000-6.0000 sec 82.4 MBytes 691 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 6.0000-7.0000 sec 82.5 MBytes 692 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 7.0000-8.0000 sec 82.4 MBytes 691 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 8.0000-9.0000 sec 82.4 MBytes 691 Mbits/sec > ^C[ 1] 9.0000-9.5506 sec 45.0 MBytes 686 Mbits/sec > [ 1] 0.0000-9.5506 sec 783 MBytes 688 Mbits/sec
Cool, so it helps there as well.
But you knew i was interested in these numbers. So you should of made them part of the commit message so i didn't have to ask...
Andrew
| |