lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Sep 27 (uml 64-bit or 32-bit: tinyconfig)
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 08:27:13PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 9/27/22 15:42, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:33:19PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9/27/22 14:28, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:13:29PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9/27/22 13:10, broonie@kernel.org wrote:
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Changes since 20220923:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> In file included from ../include/linux/notifier.h:16,
> >>>> from ../include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:7,
> >>>> from ../include/linux/mmzone.h:1244,
> >>>> from ../include/linux/gfp.h:7,
> >>>> from ../include/linux/slab.h:15,
> >>>> from ../include/linux/crypto.h:20,
> >>>> from ../arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:5,
> >>>> from ../arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1:
> >>>> ../include/linux/srcu.h: In function ‘srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’:
> >>>> ../include/linux/srcu.h:181:26: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’; did you mean ‘srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >>>> 181 | retval = __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(ssp, true);
> >>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>> | srcu_read_lock_nmisafe
> >>>> ../include/linux/srcu.h: In function ‘srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’:
> >>>> ../include/linux/srcu.h:226:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’; did you mean ‘srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >>>> 226 | __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(ssp, idx, true);
> >>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>> | srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe
> >>>
> >>> Could you please send your .config or tell me how you generated it?
> >>
> >>
> >> For x86_64 SUBARCH, ARCH=um:
> >>
> >> mkdir UML64
> >> make ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 O=UML64 tinyconfig
> >> make ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 O=UML64 all
> >
> > Thank you! The diff shown below clears it up for me. Does it cover it
> > for you as well?
>
> Works for me. Thanks.
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested

Thank you, Randy!

Thanx, Paul

> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
> > index 274d7200ce4e..565f60d57484 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/srcu.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
> > @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ int init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
> > #else
> > /* Dummy definition for things like notifiers. Actual use gets link error. */
> > struct srcu_struct { };
> > +int __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool chknmisafe) __acquires(ssp);
> > +void __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx, bool chknmisafe) __releases(ssp);
> > #endif
> >
> > void call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *head,
>
> --
> ~Randy

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-28 08:26    [W:0.054 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site