Messages in this thread | | | From | "Jason A. Donenfeld" <> | Date | Wed, 28 Sep 2022 11:21:05 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/vsprintf: Initialize vsprintf's pointer hash once the random core is ready. |
| |
On 9/28/22, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote: > >> I could replace "system_unbound_wq" with "system_wq" when >> pushing. Is anybody against it, please? > > so schedule_delayed_work() then? > I don't mind at all. I used that one just because serialisation is not > needed and neither is the CPU important.
Indeed, given that this very much is unbound, I think Sebastian's original patch makes most sense.
Jason
| |