lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] mm: use update_mmu_tlb() on the second thread
From


On 2022/9/29 11:27, maobibo wrote:
> 在 2022/9/29 11:07, Qi Zheng 写道:
>>
>>
>> On 2022/9/26 22:34, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 26.09.22 13:56, Qi Zheng wrote:
>>>> As message in commit 7df676974359 ("mm/memory.c: Update local TLB
>>>> if PTE entry exists") said, we should update local TLB only on the
>>>> second thread. So in the do_anonymous_page() here, we should use
>>>> update_mmu_tlb() instead of update_mmu_cache() on the second thread.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220924053239.91661-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com/
>>>>
>>>> Changelog in v1 -> v2:
>>>>   - change the subject and commit message (David)
>>>>
>>>>   mm/memory.c | 2 +-
>>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
>>>> index 118e5f023597..9e11c783ba0e 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/memory.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/memory.c
>>>> @@ -4122,7 +4122,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>>>>       vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->address,
>>>>               &vmf->ptl);
>>>>       if (!pte_none(*vmf->pte)) {
>>>> -        update_mmu_cache(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
>>>> +        update_mmu_tlb(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
>>>>           goto release;
>>>>       }
>>>
>>>
>>> Staring at 7df676974359, it indeed looks like an accidental use [nothing else in that patch uses update_mmu_cache].
>>>
>>> So it looks good to me, but a confirmation from Bibo Mao might be good.
>>
>> Thanks, and Hi Bibo, any comments here? :)
>
> update_mmu_tlb is defined as empty on loongarch, maybe some lines should
> be added in file arch/loongarch/include/asm/pgtable.h like this:

Seems like a bug? Because there are many other places where
update_mmu_tlb() is called.

>
> +#define __HAVE_ARCH_UPDATE_MMU_TLB
> +#define update_mmu_tlb update_mmu_cache

If so, I can make the above as a separate fix patch.

Thanks,
Qi

>
> regards
> bibo mao
>>
>>>
>>
>

--
Thanks,
Qi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-29 05:48    [W:0.046 / U:0.640 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site