Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:33:19 -0700 | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 27 (uml 64-bit or 32-bit: tinyconfig) | From | Randy Dunlap <> |
| |
On 9/27/22 14:28, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:13:29PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> >> On 9/27/22 13:10, broonie@kernel.org wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20220923: >>> >> >> In file included from ../include/linux/notifier.h:16, >> from ../include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:7, >> from ../include/linux/mmzone.h:1244, >> from ../include/linux/gfp.h:7, >> from ../include/linux/slab.h:15, >> from ../include/linux/crypto.h:20, >> from ../arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:5, >> from ../arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1: >> ../include/linux/srcu.h: In function ‘srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’: >> ../include/linux/srcu.h:181:26: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’; did you mean ‘srcu_read_lock_nmisafe’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> 181 | retval = __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(ssp, true); >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> | srcu_read_lock_nmisafe >> ../include/linux/srcu.h: In function ‘srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’: >> ../include/linux/srcu.h:226:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’; did you mean ‘srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> 226 | __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(ssp, idx, true); >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> | srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe > > Could you please send your .config or tell me how you generated it?
For x86_64 SUBARCH, ARCH=um:
mkdir UML64 make ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 O=UML64 tinyconfig make ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 O=UML64 all
-- ~Randy
| |