lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/3] perf lock: Print the number of lost entries for BPF
From
Hi,

On 02. 08. 22, 21:10, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Like the normal perf lock contention output, it'd print the number of
> lost entries for BPF if exists or -v option is passed. Currently it
> uses BROKEN_CONTENDED stat for the lost count (due to full stack maps).
...
> --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
...
> @@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ int enabled;
> int has_cpu;
> int has_task;
>
> +/* error stat */
> +unsigned long lost;

I don't know how all this is generated into lock_contention.skel.h. But
I believe this patch breaks perf build on 32bit:
> [ 375s] In file included from util/bpf_lock_contention.c:13:
> [ 375s] util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.skel.h: In function 'lock_contention_bpf__assert':
> [ 375s] util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.skel.h:537:9: error: static assertion failed: "unexpected size of \'lost\'"
> [ 375s] 537 | _Static_assert(sizeof(s->bss->lost) == 8, "unexpected size of 'lost'");
> [ 375s] | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Should the above (and below too) be __u64?

> --- a/tools/perf/util/lock-contention.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/lock-contention.h
> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ struct lock_contention {
> struct machine *machine;
> struct hlist_head *result;
> unsigned long map_nr_entries;
> + unsigned long lost;

thanks,
--
js
suse labs

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-26 10:07    [W:0.106 / U:0.796 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site