Re: [PATCH mm] mm: fix BUG with kvzalloc+GFP_ATOMIC
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote: > > kvzalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) was perfectly fine, is this illegal again? > > kvmalloc has never really supported GFP_ATOMIC semantic.
It did, you added it: ce91f6ee5b3b ("mm: kvmalloc does not fallback to vmalloc for incompatible gfp flags")