lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] mm: oom: introduce cpuset oom

On 2022/9/23 03:18, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2022, Gang Li wrote:
>
>> cpuset confine processes to processor and memory node subsets.
>> When a process in cpuset triggers oom, it may kill a completely
>> irrelevant process on another numa node, which will not release any
>> memory for this cpuset.
>>
>> It seems that `CONSTRAINT_CPUSET` is not really doing much these
>> days. Using CONSTRAINT_CPUSET, we can easily achieve node aware oom
>> killing by selecting victim from the cpuset which triggers oom.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
>
> Hmm, is this the right approach?
>
> If a cpuset results in a oom condition, is there a reason why we'd need to
> find a process from within that cpuset to kill? I think the idea is to
> free memory on the oom set of nodes (cpuset.mems) and that can happen by
> killing a process that is not a member of this cpuset.
>
Hi,

My last patch implemented this idea[1][2]. But it needs to inc/dec a per
mm_struct counter on every page allocation/release/migration.

As the Unixbench show, this takes 0%-3% performance loss on different
workloads[2]. So Michal Hocko inspired me to use cpuset[3].

[1].
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220512044634.63586-1-ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com/
[2].
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220708082129.80115-1-ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com/
[3]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/YoJ%2FioXwGTdCywUE@dhcp22.suse.cz/

> I understand the challenges of creating a NUMA aware oom killer to target
> memory that is actually resident on an oom node, but this approach doesn't
> seem right and could actually lead to pathological cases where a small
> process trying to fork in an otherwise empty cpuset is repeatedly oom
> killing when we'd actually prefer to kill a single large process.
>

I think there are three ways to achieve NUMA aware oom killer:

1. Count every page operations, which cause performance loss[2].
2. Iterate over pages(like show_numa_map) for all processes, which may
stuck oom.
3. Select victim in a cpuset, which may leads to pathological kill.(this
patch)

None of them are perfect and I'm getting stuck, do you have any ideas?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-26 05:38    [W:0.053 / U:0.752 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site