lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv8 00/11] Linear Address Masking enabling
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 08:31:13AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 9/23/22 08:28, Ashok Raj wrote:
> >>
> >> I thought devices also cached address translation responses from the
> >> IOMMU and stashed them in their own device-local TLB. If the device is
> >> unaware of the tags, then how does device TLB invalidation work? Would
> > This is coming a full circle now :-)
> >
> > Since the device doesn't understand tagging, SVM and tagging aren't
> > compatible. If you need SVM, you can only send sanitized pointers to the
> > device period. In fact our page-request even looks for canonical checks
> > before doing the page-faulting.
> >
> >> all device TLB flushes be full flushes of the devices TLB? If something
> >> tried to use single-address invalidation, it would need to invalidate
> >> every possible tag alias because the device wouldn't know that the tags
> >> *are* tags instead of actual virtual addresses.
> > Once tagging is extended into the PCI SIG, and devices know to work with
> > them, so will the IOMMU, then they can all play in the same field. Until
> > then they are isolated, or let SVM only work with untagged VA's.
>
> But, the point that Kirill and I were getting at is still that devices
> *have* a role to play here. The idea that this can be hidden at the
> IOMMU layer is pure fantasy. Right?

If you *can't* send tagged memory to the device, what is the
role the device need to play?

For now you can only send proper VA's that are canonical.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-23 17:46    [W:0.229 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site