lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/3] dmaengine: tegra: Add support for dma-channel-mask
From


On 19/09/2022 12:25, Akhil R wrote:
> Add support for dma-channel-mask so that only the specified channels
> are used. This helps to reserve some channels for the firmware.
>
> This was initially achieved by limiting the channel number to 31 in
> the driver and adjusting the register address to skip channel0 which
> was reserved for a firmware. Now, with this change, the driver can
> align more to the actual hardware which has 32 channels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akhil R <akhilrajeev@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/tegra186-gpc-dma.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra186-gpc-dma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra186-gpc-dma.c
> index fa9bda4a2bc6..1d1180db6d4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/tegra186-gpc-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/tegra186-gpc-dma.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,10 @@
> #define TEGRA_GPCDMA_BURST_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT 5000 /* 5 msec */
>
> /* Channel base address offset from GPCDMA base address */
> -#define TEGRA_GPCDMA_CHANNEL_BASE_ADD_OFFSET 0x20000
> +#define TEGRA_GPCDMA_CHANNEL_BASE_ADDR_OFFSET 0x10000

Why did this value change? There is no mention in the commit message. If
this was incorrect before, then this needs to be a separate patch and
tagged with the appropriate fixes tag so that this can be picked up for
stable.

Thanks
Jon

--
nvpublic

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-23 12:09    [W:0.244 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site