lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195-mt6359: Use snd_soc_pm_ops instead of custom ops
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:39:54PM +0800, Trevor Wu wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 16:10 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > Il 22/09/22 15:30, Mark Brown ha scritto:
> > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 07:26:21PM +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> > >
> > > > snd_soc_pm_ops[1] sets some more fields. I'm not quite sure
> > > > whether
> > > > it would introduce any side effect or not. Perhaps Trevor could
> > > > provide some suggestions.
> > >
> > > If it does it should be to fix isues rather than introduce new
> > > problems - I suspect the other operations just don't work
> > > currently.
> >
> > From my upstream tests, this didn't introduce any issues, that's why
> > I've
> > sent this patch.
> >
> > In any case, let's check with Trevor, just as to be extremely sure,
> > but please
> > use an upstream kernel for eventual tests, as there are quite a bit
> > of changes
> > between 5.10 and current upstream.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Angelo
>
> I think it's not a big risk if Angelo already did the test and
> snd_soc_pm_ops is also used in MT8186.
> I can help do more tests on 5.10 when the patch is back to chromium in
> the future.
> MTK also have a plan to support complete suspend/resume functionality
> in MT8195. If Tzung-bi has concerns about the patch, I can help submit
> the patch at the time.

I have no further concern as long as you guys are also aware of the change.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-23 07:04    [W:0.053 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site