lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v11 2/9] overflow: Move and add few utility macros into overflow
Date
Moves overflows_type utility macro into overflow header from i915_utils
header. The overflows_type can be used to catch the truncaion (overflow)
between different data types. And it adds check_assign() macro which
performs an assigning source value into destination pointer along with an
overflow check. overflow_type macro has been improved to handle the
different data types between source and destination by check_add_overflow
macro. It also adds check_assign_user_ptr macro which performs an assigning
source value into destination pointer type variable along with an overflow
check. If an explicit overflow check is required while assigning,
check_assign_user_ptr() can be used to assign integers into pointers along
with an overflow check.

v3: Add is_type_unsigned() macro (Mauro)
Modify overflows_type() macro to consider signed data types (Mauro)
Fix the problem that safe_conversion() macro always returns true
v4: Fix kernel-doc markups
v6: Move macro addition location so that it can be used by other than drm
subsystem (Jani, Mauro, Andi)
Change is_type_unsigned to is_unsigned_type to have the same name form
as is_signed_type macro
v8: Add check_assign() and remove safe_conversion() (Kees)
Fix overflows_type() to use gcc's built-in overflow function (Andrzej)
Add overflows_ptr() to allow overflow checking when assigning a value
into a pointer variable (G.G.)
v9: Fix overflows_type() to use __builtin_add_overflow() instead of
__builtin_add_overflow_p() (Andrzej)
Fix overflows_ptr() to use overflows_type() with the unsigned long type
(Andrzej)
v10: Remove a redundant type checking for a pointer. (Andrzej)
Use updated check_add_overflow macro instead of __builtin_add_overflow
(G.G)
Add check_assign_user_ptr() macro and drop overflows_ptr() macro(Kees)
v11: Fix incorrect type assignment between different address spaces caused
by the wrong use of __user macro. (kernel test robot)
Update macro description (G.G)

Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> (v5)
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> (v9)
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_user_extensions.c | 6 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 5 +-
include/linux/overflow.h | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_user_extensions.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_user_extensions.c
index c822d0aafd2d..80ec8390b0d8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_user_extensions.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_user_extensions.c
@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@ int i915_user_extensions(struct i915_user_extension __user *ext,
if (err)
return err;

- if (get_user(next, &ext->next_extension) ||
- overflows_type(next, ext))
+ if (get_user(next, &ext->next_extension))
return -EFAULT;

- ext = u64_to_user_ptr(next);
+ if (check_assign_user_ptr(next, ext))
+ return -EFAULT;
}

return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
index 6c14d13364bf..efd3d69b78f7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <linux/sched/clock.h>
+#include <linux/overflow.h>

#ifdef CONFIG_X86
#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
@@ -111,10 +112,6 @@ bool i915_error_injected(void);
#define range_overflows_end_t(type, start, size, max) \
range_overflows_end((type)(start), (type)(size), (type)(max))

-/* Note we don't consider signbits :| */
-#define overflows_type(x, T) \
- (sizeof(x) > sizeof(T) && (x) >> BITS_PER_TYPE(T))
-
#define ptr_mask_bits(ptr, n) ({ \
unsigned long __v = (unsigned long)(ptr); \
(typeof(ptr))(__v & -BIT(n)); \
diff --git a/include/linux/overflow.h b/include/linux/overflow.h
index 19dfdd74835e..0eca3d8281b2 100644
--- a/include/linux/overflow.h
+++ b/include/linux/overflow.h
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <linux/compiler.h>
#include <linux/limits.h>
#include <linux/const.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>

/*
* We need to compute the minimum and maximum values representable in a given
@@ -127,6 +128,69 @@ static inline bool __must_check __must_check_overflow(bool overflow)
(*_d >> _to_shift) != _a); \
}))

+/**
+ * check_assign - perform an assigning source value into destination pointer
+ * along with an overflow check.
+ *
+ * @value: source value
+ * @ptr: Destination pointer address
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * If the value would overflow the destination, it returns true. If not return
+ * false. When overflow does not occur, the assigning into destination from
+ * value succeeds. It follows the return policy as other check_*_overflow()
+ * functions return non-zero as a failure.
+ */
+#define check_assign(value, ptr) __must_check_overflow(({ \
+ check_add_overflow(0, value, ptr); \
+}))
+
+/**
+ * check_assign_user_ptr - perform an assigning source value into destination
+ * pointer type variable along with an overflow check
+ *
+ * @value: source value; a source value is expected to have a value of a size
+ * that can be stored in a pointer-type variable.
+ * @ptr: destination pointer type variable
+ *
+ * u64_to_user_ptr can be used in the kernel to avoid warnings about integers
+ * and pointers of different sizes. But u64_to_user_ptr is not performing the
+ * checking of overflow. If you need an explicit overflow check while
+ * assigning, check_assign_user_ptr() can be used to assign integers into
+ * pointers along with an overflow check. If ptr is not a pointer type,
+ * a warning message outputs while compiling.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * If the value would overflow the destination, it returns true. If not return
+ * false. When overflow does not occur, the assigning into ptr from value
+ * succeeds. It follows the return policy as other check_*_overflow() functions
+ * return non-zero as a failure.
+ */
+#define check_assign_user_ptr(value, ptr) __must_check_overflow(({ \
+ uintptr_t kptr; \
+ check_assign(value, &kptr) ? 1 : (({ ptr = (void __user *)kptr; }), 0); \
+}))
+
+/**
+ * overflows_type - helper for checking the overflows between value, variables,
+ * or data type
+ *
+ * @x: source constant value or variable for overflow check
+ * @T: destination variable or data type for overflow check
+ *
+ * It compares the value, variables, or data type between the first and second
+ * argument to check whether overflow can occur when assigning the first
+ * argument to the variable of the second argument data type. Source and
+ * Destination can be different data types.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * True if overflow can occur, false otherwise.
+ */
+#define overflows_type(x, T) __must_check_overflow(({ \
+ typeof(T) v = 0; \
+ check_add_overflow((x), v, &v); \
+}))
+
/**
* size_mul() - Calculate size_t multiplication with saturation at SIZE_MAX
*
--
2.37.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-23 10:27    [W:0.673 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site