Messages in this thread | | | From | ChiaWei Wang <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH] ipmi: kcs: aspeed: Update port address comments | Date | Fri, 23 Sep 2022 01:12:52 +0000 |
| |
> From: Corey Minyard <tcminyard@gmail.com> On Behalf Of Corey Minyard > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2022 8:47 AM > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:38:08AM +0000, ChiaWei Wang wrote: > > > From: Corey Minyard <tcminyard@gmail.com> On Behalf Of Corey > Minyard > > > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2022 8:21 AM > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:08:07AM +0000, ChiaWei Wang wrote: > > > > Hi Corey, > > > > > > > > > From: Corey Minyard <tcminyard@gmail.com> On Behalf Of Corey > > > Minyard > > > > > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2022 2:58 AM > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 10:03:33AM +0800, Chia-Wei Wang wrote: > > > > > > Remove AST_usrGuide_KCS.pdf as it is no longer maintained. > > > > > > > > > > Even if it's no longer maintained, is it useful? It seems > > > > > better to leave in useful documentation unless it has been > > > > > replaced with something > > > else. > > > > > > > > This document has no permeant public link to access. > > > > Aspeed has dropped this file but we keep receiving customer > > > > request asking > > > for this document. > > > > The most important part regarding KCS port rule is still kept in > > > > the updated > > > comment. > > > > > > I mean, if you have code that is implementing what is documented, > > > why did you remove the document? I don't understand why you would > > > retire documentation that people still want to use. > > > > > > I could put it on the IPMI sourceforge or github page as a historical > document. > > > > This document is a personal note of one of our former employee. > > It is known to only the owner and his supporting customers. > > Most of us has no access to this document. > > In addition, after chip revision, certain information is not guaranteed > anymore. > > Ok, I'll take the patch. Thanks.
Thanks!
Regards, Chiawei
| |