lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/8] scripts/kallsyms: don't compress symbol type when CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL=y
On Wed 2022-09-21 10:42:56, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>
>
> On 2022/9/21 1:26, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Fri 2022-09-09 21:00:09, Zhen Lei wrote:
> >> Currently, to search for a symbol, we need to expand the symbols in
> >> 'kallsyms_names' one by one, and then use the expanded string for
> >> comparison. This is very slow.
> >>
> >> In fact, we can first compress the name being looked up and then use
> >> it for comparison when traversing 'kallsyms_names'.
> >
> > This does not explain how this patch modifies the compressed data
> > and why it is needed.
>
> Yes, I have updated the description from the v3 version.

Ah, there is even v4. I have missed that. The commit message looks
much better there.

> So if we don't compress the symbol type, we can first compress the
> searched symbol and then make a quick comparison based on the compressed
> length and content. In this way, for entries with mismatched lengths,
> there is no need to expand and compare strings. And for those matching
> lengths, there's no need to expand the symbol. This saves a lot of time.
>
> >
> >
> >> This increases the size of 'kallsyms_names'. About 48KiB, 2.67%, on x86
> >> with defconfig.
> >> Before: kallsyms_num_syms=131392, sizeof(kallsyms_names)=1823659
> >> After : kallsyms_num_syms=131392, sizeof(kallsyms_names)=1872418
> >>
> >> However, if CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL is not set, the size of 'kallsyms_names'
> >> does not change.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> scripts/kallsyms.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/scripts/kallsyms.c b/scripts/kallsyms.c
> >> index f18e6dfc68c5839..ab6fe7cd014efd1 100644
> >> --- a/scripts/kallsyms.c
> >> +++ b/scripts/kallsyms.c
> >> + */
> >> + if (all_symbols)
> >> + sym_start_idx = 1;
> >
> > This looks a bit fragile. My understanding is that the new code in
> > kernel/kallsyms.c and kernel/module/kallsyms.c depends on this change.
>
> They do not depend on this change, because the index in
> insert_real_symbols_in_table() is still starting from 0. kallsyms_expand_symbol()
> shows that it uses every byte of the compressed data to look up the token table.
> The index in insert_real_symbols_in_table() starting from 0 make sure that the
> raw character of 'type' occupies a separate position in kallsyms_token_table[].
> So that kallsyms_expand_symbol() can still work well.

I guess that we are talking about different things. Anyway, please
ignore my concern about that it is fragile. The change in
scripts/kallsyms.c does not longer depend on --all-symbols parameter
in the last v4 patchset.

> > I would personally suggest to store the symbol type into a separate
> > sym->type entry in struct sym_entry and never compress it.
>
> Yes,I've also considered this, for the purpose of increasing the
> compression ratio. See below, if the sorting is performed based on
> the address and then based on the type. We can record all the symbol
> type information in less than 100 bytes. Of course, this makes the
> functions that look up symbols based on the address loop serveral
> times more. However, I would like to wait until the current patch
> series is accepted. Otherwise, I'll have to rework a lot of patches
> and it's too much work. To be honest, I've been coding for it these days.
>
> cat /proc/kallsyms | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -r
> 44678 r
> 38299 t
> 28315 T
> 11644 d
> 3768 D
> 2778 b
> 778 R
> 641 B
> 282 A
> 178 W
> 37 V

This is another optimization. I agree that we could do it later after
this patchset is accepted.

Best Regards,
Petr

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-21 09:14    [W:0.046 / U:0.984 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site