lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subject[PATCH 0/3] regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,rpmh: dt-binding fixups
Date
Hi,

This is my poor attempt at getting devicetree validation into a better
state for qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml. This is a follow-up to Johan's
request for this over here:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/Yw8EE%2FESDUnIRf8P@hovoldconsulting.com/

In particular, I'm not certain patch 1 is the correct way to handle
things, and patch 2 makes validation too wide for the *-supply nodes.

I'd love any feedback here as I'm really not experienced in any of the
spaces (regulator, rpmh, or dt schema) so nit picking is welcomed.

Thanks in advance,
Andrew

Andrew Halaney (3):
regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,rpmh: Use additionalProperties
regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,rpmh: Specify supply property
regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,rpmh: Indicate regulator-allow-set-load
dependencies

.../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--
2.37.2

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-02 20:53    [W:0.137 / U:2.680 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site