lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v4 02/13] Input: elan_i2c - Use PM subsystem to manage wake irq
Date
The Elan I2C touchpad driver is currently manually managing the wake
IRQ. This change removes the explicit enable_irq_wake/disable_irq_wake
and instead relies on the PM subsystem. This is done by calling
dev_pm_set_wake_irq.

i2c_device_probe already calls dev_pm_set_wake_irq when using device
tree, and i2c_device_remove also already calls dev_pm_clear_wake_irq.
There could be some device tree systems that have incorrectly declared
`wake` capabilities, so this change will set the wake irq if one is
missing. This matches the previous behavior.

I tested this on an ACPI system where the touchpad doesn't have _PRW
defined. I verified I can still wake the system and that the wake source
was the touchpad IRQ GPIO.

Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
---

(no changes since v2)

Changes in v2:
- Set the wake_irq when not configured by the i2c-core. This is
different than v1, where the wake_irq was only set for non DT systems.

drivers/input/mouse/elan_i2c_core.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/elan_i2c_core.c b/drivers/input/mouse/elan_i2c_core.c
index e1758d5ffe4218..3947474e93d16a 100644
--- a/drivers/input/mouse/elan_i2c_core.c
+++ b/drivers/input/mouse/elan_i2c_core.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
#include <linux/jiffies.h>
#include <linux/completion.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/pm_wakeirq.h>
#include <linux/property.h>
#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
#include <asm/unaligned.h>
@@ -86,8 +87,6 @@ struct elan_tp_data {
u16 fw_page_size;
u32 fw_signature_address;

- bool irq_wake;
-
u8 min_baseline;
u8 max_baseline;
bool baseline_ready;
@@ -1340,6 +1339,15 @@ static int elan_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
if (!dev->of_node)
device_init_wakeup(dev, true);

+ /*
+ * The wake IRQ should be declared via device tree instead of assuming
+ * the IRQ can wake the system. This is here for legacy reasons and
+ * will be removed once the i2c-core supports querying ACPI for wake
+ * capabilities.
+ */
+ if (!dev->power.wakeirq)
+ dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, client->irq);
+
return 0;
}

@@ -1362,8 +1370,6 @@ static int __maybe_unused elan_suspend(struct device *dev)

if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
ret = elan_sleep(data);
- /* Enable wake from IRQ */
- data->irq_wake = (enable_irq_wake(client->irq) == 0);
} else {
ret = elan_set_power(data, false);
if (ret)
@@ -1394,9 +1400,6 @@ static int __maybe_unused elan_resume(struct device *dev)
dev_err(dev, "error %d enabling regulator\n", error);
goto err;
}
- } else if (data->irq_wake) {
- disable_irq_wake(client->irq);
- data->irq_wake = false;
}

error = elan_set_power(data, true);
--
2.37.3.968.ga6b4b080e4-goog
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-19 18:00    [W:0.346 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site