lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [man-pages RFC PATCH v4] statx, inode: document the new STATX_INO_VERSION field
From
Date
On Mon, 2022-09-12 at 15:20 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jeff Layton:
>
> > On Mon, 2022-09-12 at 14:13 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > * Jeff Layton:
> > >
> > > > To do this we'd need 2 64-bit fields in the on-disk and in-memory
> > > > superblocks for ext4, xfs and btrfs. On the first mount after a crash,
> > > > the filesystem would need to bump s_version_max by the significant
> > > > increment (2^40 bits or whatever). On a "clean" mount, it wouldn't need
> > > > to do that.
> > > >
> > > > Would there be a way to ensure that the new s_version_max value has made
> > > > it to disk? Bumping it by a large value and hoping for the best might be
> > > > ok for most cases, but there are always outliers, so it might be
> > > > worthwhile to make an i_version increment wait on that if necessary.
> > >
> > > How common are unclean shutdowns in practice? Do ex64/XFS/btrfs keep
> > > counters in the superblocks for journal replays that can be read easily?
> > >
> > > Several useful i_version applications could be negatively impacted by
> > > frequent i_version invalidation.
> > >
> >
> > One would hope "not very often", but Oopses _are_ something that happens
> > occasionally, even in very stable environments, and it would be best if
> > what we're building can cope with them.
>
> I was wondering if such unclean shutdown events are associated with SSD
> “unsafe shutdowns”, as identified by the SMART counter. I think those
> aren't necessarily restricted to oopses or various forms of powerless
> (maybe depending on file system/devicemapper configuration)?
>
> I admit it's possible that the file system is shut down cleanly before
> the kernel requests the power-off state from the firmware, but the
> underlying SSD is not.
>

Yeah filesystem integrity is mostly what we're concerned with here.

I think most local filesystems effectively set a flag in the superblock
that is cleared when the it's cleanly unmounted. If that flag is set
when you go to mount then you know there was a crash. We'd probably key
off of that in some way internally.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-12 15:51    [W:0.150 / U:4.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site