lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 1/1] iio: adc: mxs-lradc-adc: Get rid of OF specifics
On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 16:36:20 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:42:25PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 18:10:06 +0100
> > Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 30 May 2022 20:33:24 +0300
> > > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > First of all, the additional conversion from vIRQ, and this is exactly
> > > > what is returned by platform_get_irq_byname(), to vIRQ is not needed.
> > > Confusing sentence form. Perhaps:
> > >
> > > First, the additional conversion from vIRQ (returned by platform_get_irq_byname())
> > > to vIRQ is not needed.
> > >
> > > > Hence, drop no-op call to irq_of_parse_and_map().
> > > >
> > > > Second, assign the firmware node instead of of_node.
>
> ...
>
> > > Seems sensible to me, but I'd like a sanity check from someone more
> > > familiar with this driver.
> >
> > This one has been outstanding for a few weeks. I'd still like
> > an Ack or similar form someone who knows this device well.
> >
> > If no one has looked at it in a week or so I'll just go with
> > my judgement and pick it up.
>
> Any news on this one? Maybe I need to resend with the better commit message?
>

From glancing back at the thread, looks like you said you were going to send
a v2 with property.h include. I think the rest of the thread is concerned
with a different issue entirely.

Jonathan


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-11 12:27    [W:0.082 / U:1.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site