Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Miaohe Lin <> | Subject | [PATCH v2 04/10] hugetlb: Use sizeof() to get the array size | Date | Thu, 1 Sep 2022 20:00:24 +0800 |
| |
It's better to use sizeof() to get the array size instead of manual calculation. Minor readability improvement.
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> --- mm/hugetlb.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index 94cb81e9b4df..c29b444a5515 100644 --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -4177,11 +4177,11 @@ static void __init hugepages_clear_pages_in_node(void) if (!hugetlb_max_hstate) { default_hstate_max_huge_pages = 0; memset(default_hugepages_in_node, 0, - MAX_NUMNODES * sizeof(unsigned int)); + sizeof(default_hugepages_in_node)); } else { parsed_hstate->max_huge_pages = 0; memset(parsed_hstate->max_huge_pages_node, 0, - MAX_NUMNODES * sizeof(unsigned int)); + sizeof(parsed_hstate->max_huge_pages_node)); } } -- 2.23.0
| |