Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:57:56 +0100 | From | Sudeep Holla <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 7/9] firmware: arm_ffa: Add v1.1 get_partition_info support |
| |
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 10:43:58AM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:07 PM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote: > > > > FF-A v1.1 adds support to discovery the UUIDs of the partitions that was > > missing in v1.0 and which the driver workarounds by using UUIDs supplied > > by the ffa_drivers. > > > > Add the v1.1 get_partition_info support and disable the workaround if > > the detected FF-A version is greater than v1.0. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > > --- > > drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > include/linux/arm_ffa.h | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c > > index 5c8484b05c50..6822241168d6 100644 > > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c > > @@ -264,18 +264,24 @@ static int ffa_rxtx_unmap(u16 vm_id) > > return 0; > > } > > > > +#define PARTITION_INFO_GET_RETURN_COUNT_ONLY BIT(0) > > + > > /* buffer must be sizeof(struct ffa_partition_info) * num_partitions */ > > static int > > __ffa_partition_info_get(u32 uuid0, u32 uuid1, u32 uuid2, u32 uuid3, > > struct ffa_partition_info *buffer, int num_partitions) > > { > > - int count; > > + int idx, count, flags = 0, size; > > ffa_value_t partition_info; > > > > + if (!buffer || !num_partitions) /* Just get the count for now */ > > + flags = PARTITION_INFO_GET_RETURN_COUNT_ONLY; > > + > > mutex_lock(&drv_info->rx_lock); > > invoke_ffa_fn((ffa_value_t){ > > .a0 = FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET, > > .a1 = uuid0, .a2 = uuid1, .a3 = uuid2, .a4 = uuid3, > > + .a5 = flags, > > }, &partition_info); > > > > if (partition_info.a0 == FFA_ERROR) { > > @@ -285,8 +291,15 @@ __ffa_partition_info_get(u32 uuid0, u32 uuid1, u32 uuid2, u32 uuid3, > > > > count = partition_info.a2; > > > > + if (drv_info->version > FFA_VERSION_1_0) > > + size = partition_info.a3; > > What happens if this value is larger than sizeof(struct ffa_partition_info)? >
Right, I had the check for both 0 size and size > struct size. I removed both at once instead of just dropping 0 size. I assume 0 size is non compliant or do you prefer to keep that check as well.
Thanks a lot for the reviews.
-- Regards, Sudeep
| |