lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/11] DYNAMIC_DEBUG for this cycle
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 11:35:30AM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> Hi Greg, Jason,
>
> Please consider these for this rc-cycle.
> - 1-9 have Jason's Ack,
> - 9th removes unused EXPORTed fn.
> - 10 is simple var cleanup
> - 11 is a partial decoupling of dyndbg from kernel/module
>
> Jim Cromie (11):
> dyndbg: fix static_branch manipulation
> dyndbg: fix module.dyndbg handling
> dyndbg: show both old and new in change-info
> dyndbg: reverse module walk in cat control
> dyndbg: reverse module.callsite walk in cat control
> dyndbg: use ESCAPE_SPACE for cat control
> dyndbg: let query-modname override actual module name
> dyndbg: add test_dynamic_debug module
> dyndbg: drop EXPORTed dynamic_debug_exec_queries
> dyndbg: cleanup auto vars in dynamic_debug_init
> dyndbg: create and use struct _ddebug_info
>
> MAINTAINERS | 2 +
> include/linux/dynamic_debug.h | 22 ++----
> kernel/module/internal.h | 4 +-
> kernel/module/main.c | 18 ++---
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 10 +++
> lib/Makefile | 1 +
> lib/dynamic_debug.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> lib/test_dynamic_debug.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++
> 8 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 lib/test_dynamic_debug.c
>
> --
> 2.37.1
>

Is this still ok for linux-next now to go into 6.1-rc1?

Or does it need to be rebased?

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-01 18:11    [W:1.835 / U:0.536 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site