Messages in this thread | | | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Date | Tue, 9 Aug 2022 13:14:49 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1] mm/gup: fix FOLL_FORCE COW security issue and remove FOLL_COW |
| |
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 1:07 PM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote: > > > /* But FOLL_FORCE has no effect on shared mappings */ > > if (vma->vm_flags & MAP_SHARED) > > return false; > > I'd actually rather check for MAP_MAYSHARE here, which is even stronger. > Thoughts?
Hmm. Adding the test for both is basically free (all those vm_flags checks end up being a bit mask and compare), so no objections.
For some reason I though VM_SHARED and VM_MAYSHARE end up always being the same bits, and it was a mistake to make them two bits in the first place (unlike the read/write/exec bits that can are about mprotect),
But as there are two bits, I'm sure somebody ends up touching one and not the other.
So yeah, I don't see any downside to just checking both bits.
[ That said, is_cow_mapping() only checks VM_SHARED, so if they are ever different, that's a potential source of confusion ]
Linus
| |