lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 00/33] New thermal OF code
From
On 8/9/22 01:53, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On 08/08/2022 12:26, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
>>> But I guess even if that is fixed, the driver will not probe due to the
>>> missing trip points? Are they now mandatory? Does it mean we'd need to
>>> update our device trees? But that will then mean older devices trees
>>> don't work anymore.
>>
>> It would also mean that all hwmon drivers registering a thermal zone sensor
>> would fail to register unless such a thermal zone actually exists.
>
> Probably missing something but if the thermal zone is not described, the hwmon driver won't initialize. And except if I'm wrong, that was already the case before these changes, no?
>

In the hwmon source (you point to it below):

if (IS_ERR(tzd)) {
if (PTR_ERR(tzd) != -ENODEV)
return PTR_ERR(tzd);
dev_info(dev, "temp%d_input not attached to any thermal zone\n",
index + 1);
devm_kfree(dev, tdata);
return 0;
}

That contradicts "if the thermal zone is not described, the hwmon driver won't initialize".
Now I must be missing something, since you mention that yourself below, and your new patch
series fixes the problem, at least AFAICS. Confused.

Guenter

>> This
>> would make the whole concept of having the hwmon core register thermal
>> zone sensors impossible.
>
> No, only the way the thermal OF is implemented changed. No functional changes. So AFAICT, you can still create thermal zones with the hwmon.
>
>> I have no idea how this is expected to work now,
>> but there is an apparent flaw in the logic. That means I withdraw my
>> Acked-by: for the hwmon patches in this series until it is guaranteed
>> that hwmon registration does not fail as above if there is no thermal
>> zone associated with a sensor.
>
>
> If the thermal zone creation fails with -ENODEV, then it is no considered as an error when creating the hwmon [1]
>
> The function [devm]_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() checks if there is a thermal zone description, if not it bails out with -ENODEV [2]
>
> Otherwise it checks all the thermal zones if the device passed as parameter matches a sensor in the thermal zone [3][4]
>
> If there is no match, then it returns -ENODEV which is the default error code [5]
>
> My understanding is there is no thermal zone creation if there is no description in the device tree for such a device in the thermal zone.
>
> The issue we had here was the confusing error message when -ENODEV (before was -EINVAL) is returning while before the code was silently continuing without creating the thermal zone.
>
> We are talking here about what is in under CONFIG_THERMAL_OF in the hwmon code path. The rest is untouched.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
>
>
> [1] https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux/+/refs/tags/v5.18/drivers/hwmon/hwmon.c#230
>
> [2] https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux/+/refs/tags/v5.18/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c#499
>
> [3] https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux/+/refs/tags/v5.18/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c#510
>
> [4] https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux/+/refs/tags/v5.18/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c#428
>
> [5] https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux/+/refs/tags/v5.18/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c#497

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-09 16:34    [W:0.278 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site