lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 1/2] Enable balloon drivers to report inflated memory
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 12:49:32PM +0300, Alexander Atanasov wrote:
> Display reported in /proc/meminfo as:
>
> Inflated(total) or Inflated(free)
>
> depending on the driver.
>
> Drivers use the sign bit to indicate where they do account
> the inflated memory.
>
> Amount of inflated memory can be used by:
> - as a hint for the oom a killer
> - user space software that monitors memory pressure
>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Atanasov <alexander.atanasov@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst | 5 +++++
> fs/proc/meminfo.c | 11 +++++++++++
> include/linux/mm.h | 4 ++++
> mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++++
> 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
> index 1bc91fb8c321..064b5b3d5bd8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
> @@ -986,6 +986,7 @@ Example output. You may not have all of these fields.
> VmallocUsed: 40444 kB
> VmallocChunk: 0 kB
> Percpu: 29312 kB
> + Inflated(total): 2097152 kB
> HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB
> AnonHugePages: 4149248 kB
> ShmemHugePages: 0 kB
> @@ -1133,6 +1134,10 @@ VmallocChunk
> Percpu
> Memory allocated to the percpu allocator used to back percpu
> allocations. This stat excludes the cost of metadata.
> +Inflated(total) or Inflated(free)
> + Amount of memory that is inflated by the balloon driver.
> + Due to differences among balloon drivers inflated memory
> + is either subtracted from TotalRam or from MemFree.
> HardwareCorrupted
> The amount of RAM/memory in KB, the kernel identifies as
> corrupted.
> diff --git a/fs/proc/meminfo.c b/fs/proc/meminfo.c
> index 6e89f0e2fd20..ebbe52ccbb93 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/meminfo.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/meminfo.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ static int meminfo_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> unsigned long pages[NR_LRU_LISTS];
> unsigned long sreclaimable, sunreclaim;
> int lru;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_BALLOON
> + long inflated_kb;
> +#endif
>
> si_meminfo(&i);
> si_swapinfo(&i);
> @@ -153,6 +156,14 @@ static int meminfo_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> global_zone_page_state(NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES));
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_BALLOON
> + inflated_kb = atomic_long_read(&mem_balloon_inflated_kb);
> + if (inflated_kb >= 0)
> + seq_printf(m, "Inflated(total): %8ld kB\n", inflated_kb);
> + else
> + seq_printf(m, "Inflated(free): %8ld kB\n", -inflated_kb);
> +#endif
> +
> hugetlb_report_meminfo(m);
>
> arch_report_meminfo(m);


This seems too baroque for my taste.
Why not just have two counters for the two pruposes?
And is there any value in having this atomic?
We want a consistent value but just READ_ONCE seems sufficient ...


> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 7898e29bcfb5..b190811dc16e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -2582,6 +2582,10 @@ extern int watermark_boost_factor;
> extern int watermark_scale_factor;
> extern bool arch_has_descending_max_zone_pfns(void);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_BALLOON
> +extern atomic_long_t mem_balloon_inflated_kb;
> +#endif
> +
> /* nommu.c */
> extern atomic_long_t mmap_pages_allocated;
> extern int nommu_shrink_inode_mappings(struct inode *, size_t, size_t);
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index b0bcab50f0a3..12359179a3a2 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -194,6 +194,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_on_alloc);
> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE(CONFIG_INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON, init_on_free);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_on_free);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_BALLOON
> +atomic_long_t mem_balloon_inflated_kb = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0);
> +#endif
> +
> static bool _init_on_alloc_enabled_early __read_mostly
> = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON);
> static int __init early_init_on_alloc(char *buf)
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-09 12:33    [W:0.283 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site