Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v9 02/10] bpf: Allow kfuncs to be used in LSM programs | From | Daniel Borkmann <> | Date | Tue, 9 Aug 2022 23:53:48 +0200 |
| |
On 8/9/22 3:45 PM, Roberto Sassu wrote: > From: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> > > In preparation for the addition of bpf_getxattr kfunc.
Given this is taken out of context and the series is not about bpf_getxattr, this patch should have a better commit description.
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Please also append your SoB then [0].
[0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#developer-s-certificate-of-origin-1-1
> --- > kernel/bpf/btf.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c > index d3e4c86b8fcd..67dfc728fbf8 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c > @@ -7244,6 +7244,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_type_to_kfunc_hook(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type) > case BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS: > return BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_STRUCT_OPS; > case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING: > + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM: > return BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_TRACING; > case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL: > return BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_SYSCALL; >
| |