lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add initial support for Pine64 PinePhone Pro
From
On 06/08/2022 04:37, Tom Fitzhenry wrote:
> On 6/8/22 12:10, Caleb Connolly wrote:
>> I was surprised to see this series, and this patch especially.
>> An almost ready to submit version of this patch with considerably more
>> functionality has been sat around for a while but unfortunately never
>> sent [1].
>
> Firstly, thank you for your review!
>
> I'm not sure why that other patch series has never been submitted. It
> was prepared 3 months ago (unbeknownst to me, at the time of v1), but
> since then has not been submitted.
>
> I would feel uncomfortable submitting that patch series, since I am not
> familiar with parts of the full DT. In time I intend to be, but for now
> I think we'd benefit from having a base DT mainlined, on top of which we
> can iterate and parallelise.
>
>> According to the link below (and my own knowledge of PPP development)
>> Kamil is the original author of this patch, both Kamil and Martijn
>> created the initial version of the devicetree. Given that you're using
>> their work as a base, Kamil's authorship should be respected in the
>> patch you submit.
>
> I agree authorship is important, and thus Kamil, Martijn and Megi are
> listed as Co-developed-by in this patch.

But you miss their SoB... Without them you should not send it. It does
not pass checkpatch, does it?

>
>> Their original patch [2] contained SoBs from them and Martijn, those are
>> both missing below. Both of their signed-off-by tags should be added
>> before this patch hits the mailing list, and the same for Ondrej. The
>> order also seems wrong (Ondrej should be last before you).
>
> Yes, this patch's acceptance is blocked until all Co-developed-by
> authors (Kamil, Martjin, Megi) provide their Signed-off-by to this patch.

You add SoB based on original work. When you send a patch, it is
expected to be ready (so having correct DCO chain), not incomplete from
our process point of view.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-08 08:39    [W:1.492 / U:0.836 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site