Messages in this thread | | | From | "Katakam, Harini" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH 0/2] Macb PTP enhancements | Date | Thu, 4 Aug 2022 04:35:30 +0000 |
| |
Hi Jakub,
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> > Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2022 8:05 AM > To: Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@xilinx.com> > Cc: nicolas.ferre@microchip.com; davem@davemloft.net; > richardcochran@gmail.com; claudiu.beznea@microchip.com; > andrei.pistirica@microchip.com; edumazet@google.com; > pabeni@redhat.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; michal.simek@xilinx.com; > harinikatakamlinux@gmail.com; Simek, Michal <michal.simek@amd.com>; > Katakam, Harini <harini.katakam@amd.com>; Pandey, Radhey Shyam > <radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Macb PTP enhancements > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 16:13:44 +0530 Harini Katakam wrote: > > From: Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@amd.com> > > > > This series is a follow up for patches 2 and 3 from a previous series: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ca4c97c9-1117-a465-5202-e1bf276fe75b@micro > > chip.com/ > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220517135525.GC3344@hoboy.vegasvil.org/ > > Sorry for the delay. > > > > ACK is added only to patch 3 (now patch 2). > > Patch 1 is updated with check for gem_has_ptp as per Claudiu's comments. > > These were separated from the earlier series as non-fixes, right? > But we are in the period of merge window right now, when all the new > features flow to Linus's tree and we only take fixes to avoid conflicts and give > maintainers time to settle the existing ones. > So these need to wait until -rc1 is cut. (Or is patch 1 a bug fix? > I can't tell.)
Sorry, I missed the window. Yes, both are non-fixes and I'll resend after the Tree is open.
Regards, Harini
| |