lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PM: core: Do not randomize struct dev_pm_ops layout


On August 4, 2022 10:15:08 AM PDT, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
>Because __rpm_get_callback() uses offsetof() to compute the address of
>the callback in question in struct dev_pm_ops, randomizing the layout
>of the latter leads to interesting, but unfortunately also undesirable
>results in some cases.

How does this manifest? This is a compile-time randomization, so offsetof() will find the correct location. Is struct dev_pm_ops created or consumed externally from the kernel at any point?

-Kees

>
>Prevent that from happening by using the __no_randomize_layout
>annotation on struct dev_pm_ops.
>
>Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>---
> include/linux/pm.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>Index: linux-pm/include/linux/pm.h
>===================================================================
>--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/pm.h
>+++ linux-pm/include/linux/pm.h
>@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ struct dev_pm_ops {
> int (*runtime_suspend)(struct device *dev);
> int (*runtime_resume)(struct device *dev);
> int (*runtime_idle)(struct device *dev);
>-};
>+} __no_randomize_layout;
>
> #define SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(suspend_fn, resume_fn) \
> .suspend = pm_sleep_ptr(suspend_fn), \
>
>
>

--
Kees Cook

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-05 04:13    [W:0.415 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site