lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH -next] f2fs: Replace kmalloc() with f2fs_kmalloc
From
On 2022/8/4 11:54, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 08/01, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 11:23 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 05:22:02PM +0800, studentxswpy@163.com wrote:
>>>> From: Xie Shaowen <studentxswpy@163.com>
>>>>
>>>> replace kmalloc with f2fs_kmalloc to keep f2fs code consistency.
>>>
>>> For that removing f2fs_kmalloc entirely would be way better.
>>
>> Dunno, maybe doubtful as there's a specific "fault injector" test
>> built around f2fs_<foo>alloc. (CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION)
>
> Yes, it's very useful to run the test checking the ENOMEM case.

It's useful to cover more error paths for xxx_alloc functions in f2fs
with common testcases.

>
>>
>> For a student lesson, it would significantly better to compile any
>> patch, especially to avoid broken patches, before submitting them.
>>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-04 15:51    [W:0.075 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site