[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 0/8] x86_64: Harden compressed kernel, part 1
On 2022-08-03 17:05, Dave Hansen wrote:
> That shows me that it's _possible_ to build a more strict PE loader
> that
> wouldn't load Linux. But, in practice is anyone using a more strict PE
> loader? Does anyone actually want that in practice? Or, again, is
> this
> more strict PE loader just an academic demonstration?
> The README starts:
> This branch demonstrates...
> That doesn't seem like something that's _important_ to deal with.
> Sounds like a proof-of-concept.
> Don't get me wrong, I'm all for improving thing, even if the benefits
> are far off. But, let's not fool ourselves.

We have commercial closed-source UEFI firmware implementation at ISP RAS
that follows the behavior of the secure_pe branch. That firmware is used
as a part of [1].


Evgeniy Baskov

 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-04 12:42    [W:0.058 / U:1.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site