lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 02/14] fs/buffer: add some new buffer read helpers
From
Date
Thanks for the review and suggestions.

On 2022/8/31 19:30, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 31-08-22 15:20:59, Zhang Yi wrote:
>> Current ll_rw_block() helper is fragile because it assumes that locked
>> buffer means it's under IO which is submitted by some other who hold
>> the lock, it skip buffer if it failed to get the lock, so it's only
>> safe on the readahead path. Unfortunately, now that most filesystems
>> still use this helper mistakenly on the sync metadata read path. There
>> is no guarantee that the one who hold the buffer lock always submit IO
>> (e.g. buffer_migrate_folio_norefs() after commit 88dbcbb3a484 ("blkdev:
>> avoid migration stalls for blkdev pages"), it could lead to false
>> positive -EIO when submitting reading IO.
>>
>> This patch add some friendly buffer read helpers to prepare replace
>> ll_rw_block() and similar calls. We can only call bh_readahead_[]
>> helpers for the readahead paths.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
>
> This looks mostly good. Just a few small nits below.
>
[..]
>> diff --git a/include/linux/buffer_head.h b/include/linux/buffer_head.h
>> index c3863c417b00..8a01c07c0418 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/buffer_head.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/buffer_head.h
[..]
>> +static inline void bh_read_nowait(struct buffer_head *bh, blk_opf_t op_flags)
>> +{
>> + lock_buffer(bh);
>> + __bh_read(bh, op_flags, false);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int bh_read(struct buffer_head *bh, blk_opf_t op_flags)
>> +{
>> + lock_buffer(bh);
>> + return __bh_read(bh, op_flags, true);
>> +}
>
> I would use bh_uptodate_or_lock() helper in the above two functions to
> avoid locking the buffer in case it is already uptodate.
>
Yes, it's a good point, it seems we could also remove "if (!buffer_uptodate(bh))"
before above two helpers in the latter patches, like in fs/jbd2/journal.c.

@@ -1893,15 +1893,14 @@ static int journal_get_superblock(journal_t *journal)
{
struct buffer_head *bh;
journal_superblock_t *sb;
- int err = -EIO;
+ int err;

bh = journal->j_sb_buffer;

J_ASSERT(bh != NULL);
- if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
- ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh);
- wait_on_buffer(bh);
- if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
+ err = bh_read(bh, 0);
+ if (err) {
- printk(KERN_ERR
- "JBD2: IO error reading journal superblock\n");
- goto out;
+ printk(KERN_ERR
+ "JBD2: IO error reading journal superblock\n");
+ goto out;
...

Thanks,
Yi.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-31 15:12    [W:0.583 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site