lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] ARM: Add sanity check for dev->periphid in amba_probe()
From
Date


On 2022/8/30 18:07, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 06:03:31PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2022/8/30 17:47, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:20:00AM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 11:59 PM Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Commit f2d3b9a46e0e ("ARM: 9220/1: amba: Remove deferred device addition")
>>>>> forcibly invokes device_add() even if dev->periphid is not ready. Although
>>>>> it will be remedied in amba_match(): dev->periphid will be initialized
>>>>> if everything is in place; Otherwise, return -EPROBE_DEFER to block
>>>>> __driver_attach() from further execution. But not all drivers have .match
>>>>> hook, such as pl031, the dev->bus->probe will be called directly in
>>>>> __driver_attach(). Unfortunately, if dev->periphid is still not
>>>>> initialized, the following exception will be triggered.
>>>>>
>>>>> 8<--- cut here ---
>>>>> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000008
>>>>> [00000008] *pgd=00000000
>>>>> Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM
>>>>> Modules linked in:
>>>>> CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc2+ #7
>>>>> Hardware name: ARM-Versatile Express
>>>>> PC is at pl031_probe+0x8/0x208
>>>>> LR is at amba_probe+0xf0/0x160
>>>>> pc : 80698df8 lr : 8050eb54 psr: 80000013
>>>>> sp : c0825df8 ip : 00000000 fp : 811fda38
>>>>> r10: 00000000 r9 : 80d72470 r8 : fffffdfb
>>>>> r7 : 811fd800 r6 : be7eb330 r5 : 00000000 r4 : 811fd900
>>>>> r3 : 80698df0 r2 : 37000000 r1 : 00000000 r0 : 811fd800
>>>>> Flags: Nzcv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none
>>>>> Control: 10c5387d Table: 6000406a DAC: 00000051
>>>>> ... ...
>>>>> pl031_probe from amba_probe+0xf0/0x160
>>>>> amba_probe from really_probe+0x118/0x290
>>>>> really_probe from __driver_probe_device+0x84/0xe4
>>>>> __driver_probe_device from driver_probe_device+0x30/0xd0
>>>>> driver_probe_device from __driver_attach+0x8c/0xfc
>>>>> __driver_attach from bus_for_each_dev+0x70/0xb0
>>>>> bus_for_each_dev from bus_add_driver+0x168/0x1f4
>>>>> bus_add_driver from driver_register+0x7c/0x118
>>>>> driver_register from do_one_initcall+0x44/0x1ec
>>>>> do_one_initcall from kernel_init_freeable+0x238/0x288
>>>>> kernel_init_freeable from kernel_init+0x18/0x12c
>>>>> kernel_init from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c
>>>>> ... ...
>>>>> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>>>>
>>>>> Therefore, take the same action as in amba_match(): return -EPROBE_DEFER
>>>>> if dev->periphid is not ready in amba_probe().
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: f2d3b9a46e0e ("ARM: 9220/1: amba: Remove deferred device addition")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> KernelVersion: v6.0-rc3
>>>>> drivers/amba/bus.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> v1 --> v2:
>>>>> 1. Update this patch based on:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220818172852.3548-1-isaacmanjarres@google.com/
>>>>> 2. Move the operations of sanity checking and reading dev->periphid,
>>>>> updating uevent into new function amba_prepare_periphid().
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/amba/bus.c b/drivers/amba/bus.c
>>>>> index 110a535648d2e1f..8e4c7e190880206 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/amba/bus.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/amba/bus.c
>>>>> @@ -204,10 +204,9 @@ static int amba_read_periphid(struct amba_device *dev)
>>>>> return ret;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> -static int amba_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
>>>>> +static int amba_prepare_periphid(struct device *dev)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct amba_device *pcdev = to_amba_device(dev);
>>>>> - struct amba_driver *pcdrv = to_amba_driver(drv);
>>>>>
>>>>> mutex_lock(&pcdev->periphid_lock);
>>>>> if (!pcdev->periphid) {
>>>>> @@ -228,6 +227,19 @@ static int amba_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
>>>>> }
>>>>> mutex_unlock(&pcdev->periphid_lock);
>>>>>
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static int amba_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct amba_device *pcdev = to_amba_device(dev);
>>>>> + struct amba_driver *pcdrv = to_amba_driver(drv);
>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + ret = amba_prepare_periphid(dev);
>>>>> + if (ret)
>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> /* When driver_override is set, only bind to the matching driver */
>>>>> if (pcdev->driver_override)
>>>>> return !strcmp(pcdev->driver_override, drv->name);
>>>>> @@ -278,9 +290,15 @@ static int amba_probe(struct device *dev)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct amba_device *pcdev = to_amba_device(dev);
>>>>> struct amba_driver *pcdrv = to_amba_driver(dev->driver);
>>>>> - const struct amba_id *id = amba_lookup(pcdrv->id_table, pcdev);
>>>>> + const struct amba_id *id;
>>>>> int ret;
>>>>>
>>>>> + ret = amba_prepare_periphid(dev);
>>>>> + if (ret)
>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + id = amba_lookup(pcdrv->id_table, pcdev);
>>>>> +
>>>>> do {
>>>>> ret = of_amba_device_decode_irq(pcdev);
>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>
>>>> Let's wait for Isaac to review this. He has been looking at the
>>>> locking issue for a bit and there were some tricky cases.
>>>
>>> How can we get to amba_probe() if amba_match() has not returned a
>>> positive match for an ID? Surely if that happens, the driver model
>>
>> Always return true.
>>
>> __driver_attach
>> driver_match_device
>>
>> static inline int driver_match_device(struct device_driver *drv,
>> struct device *dev)
>> {
>> return drv->bus->match ? drv->bus->match(dev, drv) : 1;
>> }
>
> You seem to be misunderstanding something rather fundamental here.
>
> For an amba driver, drv->bus will always be pointing at amba_bustype.
> That always has a "match" operation. Therefore, the default of '1'
> above will *never* be used for an AMBA driver.
>
> If drv->bus does not point at amba_bustype, then amba_probe() will
> not be called for "drv".
>
> Therefore, amba_match() must always be called before amba_probe().

Oh, I was careless. I think it's drv->match. But the processing flow
will continue to go to "dev->bus->probe".

__driver_attach():
ret = driver_match_device(drv, dev);
if (ret == 0) {
/* no match */
return 0;
} else if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) { <------no return in this branch
dev_dbg(dev, "Device match requests probe deferral\n");
dev->can_match = true;
driver_deferred_probe_add(dev);
} else if (ret < 0) {
dev_dbg(dev, "Bus failed to match device: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
} /* ret > 0 means positive match */

... ...
driver_probe_device(drv, dev);
......
dev->bus->probe


>

--
Regards,
Zhen Lei

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-30 12:31    [W:0.421 / U:2.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site