Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:04:17 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] thermal: Check the policy first in cpufreq_cooling_register |
| |
On 25-08-22, 19:40, Xuewen Yan wrote: > Since the policy needs to be accessed first when obtaining cpu devices, > first check whether the policy is legal before this. > > Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
Fixes: 5130802ddbb1 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: Switch to QoS requests for freq limits")
> --- > drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c > index b76293cc989c..7838b6e2dba5 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c > @@ -501,17 +501,17 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np, > struct thermal_cooling_device_ops *cooling_ops; > char *name; > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(policy)) { > + pr_err("%s: cpufreq policy isn't valid: %p\n", __func__, policy); > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + } > + > dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu); > if (unlikely(!dev)) { > pr_warn("No cpu device for cpu %d\n", policy->cpu); > return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); > } > > - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(policy)) { > - pr_err("%s: cpufreq policy isn't valid: %p\n", __func__, policy); > - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > - } > - > i = cpufreq_table_count_valid_entries(policy); > if (!i) { > pr_debug("%s: CPUFreq table not found or has no valid entries\n",
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-- viresh
| |