Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:55:20 +0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: leds: Expand LED_COLOR_ID definitions | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> |
| |
On 30/08/2022 11:44, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > In commit 853a78a7d6c7 (dt-bindings: leds: Add LED_COLOR_ID definitions, > Sun Jun 9 20:19:04 2019 +0200) the most basic color definitions where > added. However, there's a little more very common LED colors. > > While the documentation states 'add what is missing', engineers tend to > be lazy and will just use what currently exists. So this patch will take > (a) list from online retailers [0], [1], [2] and use the common LED colors from > there, this being reasonable as this is what is currently available to purchase. > > Note, that LIME seems to be the modern take to 'Yellow-green' or > 'Yellowish-green' from some older datasheets. > > [0]: https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/led-lighting-color/125 > [1]: https://eu.mouser.com/c/optoelectronics/led-lighting/led-emitters/standard-leds-smd > [2]: https://nl.farnell.com/en-NL/c/optoelectronics-displays/led-products/standard-single-colour-leds-under-75ma >
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540
If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Best regards, Krzysztof
| |