lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: x86: Get vmcs12 pages before checking pending interrupts
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 05:00:26PM +0000, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2022, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 03, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 23:07 +0000, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> > > > From: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
> > > >
> > > > vmx_guest_apic_has_interrupts implicitly depends on the virtual APIC
> > > > page being present + mapped into the kernel address space. However, with
> > > > demand paging we break this dependency, as the KVM_REQ_GET_VMCS12_PAGES
> > > > event isn't assessed before entering vcpu_block.
> > > >
> > > > Fix this by getting vmcs12 pages before inspecting the guest's APIC
> > > > page. Note that upstream does not have this issue, as they will directly
> > > > get the vmcs12 pages on vmlaunch/vmresume instead of relying on the
> > > > event request mechanism. However, the upstream approach is problematic,
> > > > as the vmcs12 pages will not be present if a live migration occurred
> > > > before checking the virtual APIC page.
> > >
> > > Since this patch is intended for upstream, I don't fully understand
> > > the meaning of the above paragraph.
> >
> > My apology. Some of the statement needs to be updated, which I should do
> > before sending. But I think the point here is that there is a missing
> > get_nested_state_pages() call here within vcpu_block() when there is the
> > request of KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES.

This was my poorly written changelog, sorry about that Mingwei :)

> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > > index 5366f884e9a7..1d3d8127aaea 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > > @@ -10599,6 +10599,23 @@ static inline int vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > > {
> > > > bool hv_timer;
> > > >
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * We must first get the vmcs12 pages before checking for interrupts
> > > > + * that might unblock the guest if L1 is using virtual-interrupt
> > > > + * delivery.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES, vcpu)) {
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * If we have to ask user-space to post-copy a page,
> > > > + * then we have to keep trying to get all of the
> > > > + * VMCS12 pages until we succeed.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (unlikely(!kvm_x86_ops.nested_ops->get_nested_state_pages(vcpu))) {
> > > > + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES, vcpu);
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > if (!kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu)) {
> > > > /*
> > > > * Switch to the software timer before halt-polling/blocking as
> > >
> > >
> > > If I understand correctly, you are saying that if apic backing page is migrated in post copy
> > > then 'get_nested_state_pages' will return false and thus fail?
> >
> > What I mean is that when the vCPU was halted and then migrated in this
> > case, KVM did not call get_nested_state_pages() before getting into
> > kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(). This function checks the apic backing page and
> > fails on that check and triggered the warning.
> > >
> > > AFAIK both SVM and VMX versions of 'get_nested_state_pages' assume that this is not the case
> > > for many things like MSR bitmaps and such - they always uses non atomic versions
> > > of guest memory access like 'kvm_vcpu_read_guest' and 'kvm_vcpu_map' which
> > > supposed to block if they attempt to access HVA which is not present, and then
> > > userfaultd should take over and wake them up.
> >
> > You are right here.
> > >
> > > If that still fails, nested VM entry is usually failed, and/or the whole VM
> > > is crashed with 'KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR'.
> > >
>
> Ah, I think I understand what you are saying. hmm, so basically the
> patch here is to continuously request vmcs12 pages if failed. But what
> you are saying is that we just need to call 'get_nested_state_pages'
> once. If it fails, then the VM fails to work. Let me double check and
> get back.

IIRC the reason we reset the request on a nonzero return was because our
local implementation of the VMX hook was non-blocking and would bail on
the first page that needed to be demanded from the source. So, you
effectively keep hitting the request until all the pages are pulled in.

--
Thanks,
Oliver


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-03 20:37    [W:0.065 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site