Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:06:16 -0700 | Subject | Re: thermal driver patch | From | Randy Dunlap <> |
| |
Hi Steven,
[adding Rafael, Daniel, linux-pm]
> [ 5.244369] thermal thermal_zone0: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
Some driver is returning -ENODATA to the thermal core....
Any suggestions?
On 8/29/22 05:20, Steven J Abner wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 05:47, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: >> a. the exact message(s) [copy-paste] >> c. what kernel version is causing the problem > > [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.18.12-051812-generic (kernel@sita) (gcc (Ubuntu 11.3.0-4ubuntu1) 11.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.38.50.20220629) #202207150942 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Jul 15 10:10:55 UTC 2022 > [ 5.244369] thermal thermal_zone0: failed to read out thermal zone (-61) > > [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.4.204-0504204-generic (kernel@kathleen) (gcc version 9.4.0 (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04.1)) #202207071639 SMP Thu Jul 7 16:59:09 UTC 2022 > [ 5.207243] thermal thermal_zone0: failed to read out thermal zone (-61) > > as to reproduce, can only think of saying: boot up kernel without patched? > > additional info that may? help: > I did not trace what calls 'update_temperature', just saw any call to it > will cause message due to it's call to 'thermal_zone_get_temp', which states > no thermal_zone_device should provide or be requesting an update. > It may be that if 'thermal_zone_get_temp' where removed was actual function's > intent, and all instances in this file and other function's use was a case of designer debugging or signaling a deprecated API? That was my intent on saying > 'for you to do and review', because it looked like a lot of functions could be > updated to take into account that no device should call functions that start off > by calling 'thermal_zone_get_temp'. > It is more probable that my patch suggestion is wrong and calls to > 'update_temperature' are suppose to fail with return -ENODEV always allowing > other calls to 'update_temperature' to fail also. With proposed code, I've not > seen adverse side effects. It just removed dmesg error, but was hoping I would > get lucky and it was the reason for CPUTIN -62C without actually hard work of > finding real reason. > > additional dmesg info: > only other 'thermal' are 'thermal_sys' loading governors > smpboot: CPU0: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G with Radeon Vega Graphics (family: 0x17, model: 0x11, stepping: 0x0) > from lspci: > Kernel driver in use: k10temp > from lsmod: > nct6775 > hwmon_vid > these 2 removed in personal configs, but used in the two ubuntu kernel builds: > wmi > wmi_bmof > > Steve > >
-- ~Randy
| |