lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] dt-bindings: irqchip: imx mu work as msi controller
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 19:59:44 +0100,
Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com> wrote:
>
> > And I stand by my initial request. "a" doesn't convey any sort of
> > useful information. Why not "I" and "II", while we're at it? Or
> > something even funkier?
>
> MU spec use term "a" and "b", user have to map "I" an "II" to
> "a" and "b" when read MU spec and code. it is not straightforward.
>
> I quote a part of spec.
> " The MU is connected as a peripheral under the Peripheral bus on both sides-on
> the Processor A-side, the Processor A Peripheral Bus, and on the Processor B side,
> the Processor B Peripheral Bus."
>
> Rob Herring and Marc Zynginer:
> I can change to any name, which you agree both.
>
> Some options:
> 1. "a", "b"
> 2. "a-side", "b-side"
> 3. "a-facing", "b-facing"
> 4. "I", "II"

Use the wording indicated in the spec: "processor-a-side", and
"processor-b-side". This is what I asked the first place.

M.

--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-26 23:46    [W:0.093 / U:0.392 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site