lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/4] ARM: footbridge: remove custom DMA address handling
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 12:35 PM Russell King (Oracle)
<linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:17:52AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > -/*
> > - * The footbridge is programmed to expose the system RAM at 0xe0000000.
> > - * The requirement is that the RAM isn't placed at bus address 0, which
> > - * would clash with VGA cards.
> > - */
> > -#define BUS_OFFSET 0xe0000000
> > -#define __virt_to_bus(x) ((x) + (BUS_OFFSET - PAGE_OFFSET))
> > -#define __bus_to_virt(x) ((x) - (BUS_OFFSET - PAGE_OFFSET))
>
> ... and this tells you why that is with ISA devices.
>
> So, one hell of a big NAK to this patch, sorry.

Thanks for taking a look. Apparently I misread the interface, and I assumed
that the __bus_to_virt() BUS_OFFSET in set_dma_addr() would
just cancel out the dma_map_single() in isa_enable_dma().

It turns out the logic is actually simpler and we just convert between
virtual address and bus address three times. for most drivers.

I found one driver (cs89x0-isa) that uses isa_virt_to_bus()/virt_to_phys()
instead of dma_map_single(), but that is probably never used here.
Once we move the DMA offset into the device, all other ISA devices will
also get the default zero-offset, but I think that will be fine as long as the
"isa_dma_dev" that is used for the final translation has the correct offset.

I'll try to come up with a new version tomorrow.

Arnd

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-25 19:17    [W:0.093 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site