lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] arm64/traps: Replace this_cpu_* with raw_cpu_* in panic_bad_stack()
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 02:31:53PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> The hardware automatically disable the IRQ interrupt before jumping to the
> interrupt or exception vector. Therefore, the preempt_disable() operation
> in this_cpu_read() after macro expansion is unnecessary. In fact, before
> commit 8168f098867f ("arm64: entry: split bad stack entry"), the operation
> this_cpu_read() precedes arm64_enter_nmi(). If set_preempt_need_resched()
> is called before stack overflow, this_cpu_read() may trigger scheduling,
> see pseudocode below.
>
> Pseudocode of this_cpu_read(xx) when CONFIG_PREEMPTION=y:
> preempt_disable_notrace();
> raw_cpu_read(xx);
> if (unlikely(__preempt_count_dec_and_test()))
> __preempt_schedule_notrace();

Ok, but in mainline we have commit 8168f098867f; so we cannot reach here
without having fiddled with the preempt count.

Are you saying that some stable kernel is broken because it lacks commit
8168f098867f? Is so, I think the right fix is to backport commit 8168f098867f,
and that is then irrelevant to this change.

> Therefore, use raw_cpu_* instead of this_cpu_* to eliminate potential
> hazards. At the very least, it reduces a few lines of assembly code.

I'm happy to use raw_cpu_*() here, to minimize the work we have to do, any any
risks with e.g. instrumentation, but as above I don't think the case mentioned
in the commit message is relevant.

Thanks,
Mark.

>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> index b7fed33981f7b76..e6b6f4650e3d895 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -871,8 +871,8 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE/sizeof(long)], overflow_stack)
> void panic_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long esr, unsigned long far)
> {
> unsigned long tsk_stk = (unsigned long)current->stack;
> - unsigned long irq_stk = (unsigned long)this_cpu_read(irq_stack_ptr);
> - unsigned long ovf_stk = (unsigned long)this_cpu_ptr(overflow_stack);
> + unsigned long irq_stk = (unsigned long)raw_cpu_read(irq_stack_ptr);
> + unsigned long ovf_stk = (unsigned long)raw_cpu_ptr(overflow_stack);
>
> console_verbose();
> pr_emerg("Insufficient stack space to handle exception!");
> --
> 2.25.1
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-08-25 15:31    [W:0.071 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site