Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 Aug 2022 21:27:54 +0300 | From | Jarkko Sakkinen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] x86/sgx: Do not consider unsanitized pages an error |
| |
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 07:07:44AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 8/25/22 01:08, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > However, if the SGX subsystem initialization is retracted, the sanitization > > process could end up in the middle, and sgx_dirty_page_list be left > > non-empty for legit reasons. > > What does "retraction" mean in this context?
Rest of the initialization failing or features not detected (-ENODEV).
BR, Jarkko
| |