Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Aug 2022 19:21:44 +0300 | Subject | Re: ST ST95HF DRIVER security bug | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> |
| |
On 24/08/2022 18:12, מיכאל שטראוס wrote: >> >> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to Cc relevant people. You got the >> same comment last time as well... >> > Sorry my bad, i forgot we already contacted. > I actually ran it and your name came up for some reason. > >> ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.c > > Bad divisor in main::vcs_assign: 0 > > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> (maintainer:NFC >> SUBSYSTEM) > > netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NFC SUB
and other addresses... why removing them?
> > > > >> What does it mean "current source"? Please be specific which exactly > > kernel version is affected, which commit introduced it. > > *Effected version: * > - v6.0-rc2 <https://github.com/torvalds/linux/releases/tag/v6.0-rc2> ... > - *v4.5-rc1* <https://github.com/torvalds/linux/releases/tag/v4.5-rc1> > *Introducing commit: * > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/cab47333f0f75b685bce1facecb73bf3632e1360 > > Then the risk is quite low, right? SPI busses are not user hot-pluggable >> except some development boards (so again a real niche). Basically it's >> impact is negligible >> > Agreed. > > What does it mean "remote device"? NFC? NFC tag does not talk over SPI... >> > I was wondering maybe the tag is the source for the content that actually > overflows the kernel buffer, > In which case it changes the picture a bit.
The buffer is used for SPI transfer, so the NFC tag - except that it works with that device - is rather long shot.
Best regards, Krzysztof
| |